hydrocalculators
hydrocalculators.app · Open Channel Flow

Interactive Specific Energy & E-h Diagram Visualizer

Plot the specific-energy curve for a given discharge, drag a depth marker between the subcritical and supercritical branches, and watch the Froude number and flow regime update in real time.

GEOMETRY · 4 SHAPES
UNITS · SI & US
MODE · LIVE INTERACTIVE

The specific energy of an open-channel flow is the energy per unit weight of fluid measured from the channel bed — that is, the depth of flow plus the velocity head: $E = h + v^{2}/(2g)$. It is not the same as the total energy head H, which is measured from a fixed horizontal datum and additionally includes the elevation of the channel bed itself. Specific energy is what's conserved along a horizontal section of channel; total energy is what's conserved along the stream relative to a reference plane.

The E-h curve plots specific energy E as a function of flow depth h for a fixed discharge Q. It has a characteristic two-branch shape: a steep supercritical branch where shallow, fast flow has high velocity head, and a flatter subcritical branch where deep, slow flow approaches the asymptote $E = h$. The two branches meet at a single point of minimum specific energy Emin, occurring at the critical depth hc. Any specific energy above Emin corresponds to two valid depths — the alternate depths — that can carry the same discharge.

Advertisement
Google AdSense — responsive display unit
E-h curve
X · E  ·  Y · h
E-h curve · $E = h + Q^{2}/(2g A^{2})$
Asymptote $E = h$
Critical point (Emin, hc)
Your flow state (h, E)
Flow Regime Classification
SubcriticalFr < 1
Specific energy E
m
at current depth
Froude number Fr
Critical depth hc
m
Minimum energy Emin
m
at h = hc
Velocity v
m/s
v = Q / A
Area A
at current h
Top width T
m
free surface
Alternate depth h'
m
same E, opposite branch
Sponsored
Google AdSense — native / in-feed unit

Mathematical Derivation

Begin with the Bernoulli equation for a stream tube in steady, incompressible flow. The total energy head H measured from a fixed horizontal datum is

$$ H \;=\; z_b \;+\; h \;+\; \frac{v^{2}}{2g} $$

where zb is the bed elevation above the datum, h is the depth of flow, v is the cross-sectional mean velocity, and g is gravitational acceleration. The specific energy E is the part of H measured from the channel bed itself — equivalently, H with zb subtracted:

$$ E \;=\; h \;+\; \frac{v^{2}}{2g} \;=\; h \;+\; \frac{Q^{2}}{2\,g\,A^{2}} $$

because v = Q/A. For a prismatic channel of fixed shape, the cross-sectional area A is a known function of depth h. Substituting that function gives E entirely as a function of h, with Q as a parameter. The result is the E-h curve.

Area and top-width functions for each prismatic section

The two geometric quantities that drive the calculation are the wetted area A(h) and the surface top width T(h) = dA/dh — the latter being what determines critical depth.

Shape
Area A(h)
Top width T(h)
Critical depth hc
Rectangular
$A = b\,h$
$T = b$
$h_c = \left(\dfrac{q^{2}}{g}\right)^{\!1/3},\ q=Q/b$
Triangular
$A = z\,h^{2}$
$T = 2\,z\,h$
$h_c = \left(\dfrac{2\,Q^{2}}{g\,z^{2}}\right)^{\!1/5}$
Trapezoidal
$A = (b + z\,h)\,h$
$T = b + 2\,z\,h$
numerical root of $\dfrac{Q^{2}T}{g A^{3}} = 1$
Circular
$A = \tfrac{D^{2}}{8}(\theta - \sin\theta)$
$T = D\,\sin(\theta/2)$
numerical root of $\dfrac{Q^{2}T}{g A^{3}} = 1$

where b is the bottom width, z is the side-slope ratio (horizontal : 1 vertical), D is the pipe diameter, and $\theta = 2\,\arccos(1 - 2h/D)$ is the angle subtended at the centre by the free water surface.

Minimum specific energy and critical depth

The minimum of E with respect to h occurs where the derivative dE/dh vanishes. Differentiating $E = h + Q^{2}/(2gA^{2})$ with respect to h and noting that dA/dh = T:

$$ \frac{dE}{dh} \;=\; 1 \;-\; \frac{Q^{2}\,T}{g\,A^{3}} \;=\; 0 \qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad \frac{Q^{2}\,T}{g\,A^{3}} \;=\; \mathrm{Fr}^{2} \;=\; 1 $$

So the minimum of the specific energy curve occurs exactly at the critical depth — the condition Fr = 1 and the condition dE/dh = 0 are mathematically equivalent. For a rectangular channel the result has the particularly tidy form

$$ E_\mathrm{min} \;=\; \frac{3}{2}\,h_c \qquad\text{(rectangular only)} $$

For non-rectangular sections Emin is obtained by substituting the numerically-found hc back into the specific-energy equation.

Interpreting the Curve

The shape of the E-h curve is the key teaching tool of open-channel hydraulics. Read it from the bottom upward:

The supercritical branch — the lower portion, below hc — is the regime of shallow, fast flow. Reducing the depth in this branch increases the specific energy, because the velocity head Q²/(2gA²) grows faster than h shrinks. This is the regime of chutes, spillway aprons, and the tail of a hydraulic jump.

The subcritical branch — the upper portion, above hc — is the regime of deep, slow flow. Here the velocity head is negligible and E ≈ h, so the curve asymptotes to the 45° line E = h as depth grows. This is the regime of irrigation canals, lowland rivers, and most natural channels.

The critical point — at the leftmost tip of the curve, where the two branches meet — is the depth and energy at which Fr = 1. Flow at exactly critical depth is unstable: small disturbances generate standing waves and the surface becomes choppy. Engineering designs almost always avoid running channels at critical depth.

Alternate depths — for any specific energy E greater than Emin, the horizontal line at that energy crosses the curve at two depths: one subcritical, one supercritical. Both depths can carry the same discharge with the same specific energy. They are alternate depths — a quite different concept from conjugate or sequent depths, which conserve momentum across a hydraulic jump rather than energy.

What this curve tells the designer. Pick a discharge, draw the E-h curve, and you can read off (a) the minimum energy required to pass that flow at all, (b) the critical depth at which it would just barely pass, (c) the two depths it could run at for any given energy, and (d) what depth-change to expect across a transition such as a smooth bump on the channel floor — the new depth lies on the same curve at an energy reduced by the obstacle height.

Advertisement
Google AdSense — horizontal banner unit

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Emin point on the E-h diagram?

Emin is the minimum specific energy at which a given discharge Q can flow in a prismatic channel — the leftmost point of the E-h curve. Mathematically it is where dE/dh = 0, which (after differentiation) is identical to the critical-flow condition Q²T/(gA³) = 1. The depth at which this minimum occurs is the critical depth hc.

For a rectangular section, the relationship is particularly clean: Emin = 3hc/2, and the velocity head at the critical point equals exactly half the depth. For other geometries, Emin must be computed numerically by first solving for hc and then evaluating E. Physically, Emin is the absolute lower bound on the energy needed to pass that discharge — if a transition or obstruction reduces the available specific energy below Emin, the flow chokes and a backwater develops upstream.

How do alternate depths relate on the specific energy curve?

Alternate depths are the two depths — one on the subcritical branch (h1 > hc), one on the supercritical branch (h2 < hc) — that share the same specific energy E for a given discharge Q. They lie on opposite branches of the E-h curve at the same horizontal coordinate. As E approaches Emin from above, the two alternate depths converge on hc; as E grows large, the subcritical alternate depth approaches the asymptote h ≈ E while the supercritical alternate depth approaches zero.

Alternate depths are not the same as conjugate or sequent depths. The latter are the depths upstream and downstream of a hydraulic jump — they conserve momentum (the specific force) rather than energy, and the jump itself dissipates a substantial fraction of E in turbulence. Confusing the two is one of the classic exam-trap errors of open-channel hydraulics.

Why is the E-h curve useful in hydraulic design?

The E-h diagram answers a designer's most common question — "if the channel does this, what does the depth do?" — graphically and without recomputation. Three classic applications:

(1) Bump / step transitions. If the channel floor rises by Δz over a short horizontal distance, the specific energy available downstream drops by exactly Δz. Project that new energy vertically onto the curve to find the downstream depth — without solving a nonlinear equation. The famous "bump paradox" (a bump raises the water surface in supercritical flow but lowers it in subcritical flow) falls out immediately from the curve shape.

(2) Choking analysis. A contraction or obstruction that requires the flow to pass through a section with E < Emin for the design Q forces the upstream flow to back up until enough energy is available. The E-h curve tells you exactly how much.

(3) Regime classification. The location of the normal-depth point on the curve relative to hc tells you, immediately, whether the channel is hydraulically mild or steep and where hydraulic jumps may form.

What happens to the curve when discharge Q increases?

As Q increases, the entire E-h curve shifts to the right — the velocity head Q²/(2gA²) grows at every depth, so every point on the curve moves to a higher E. The critical point moves both up and right: hc grows (because more flow needs more depth to pass critically) and Emin grows correspondingly (because the minimum energy required goes up).

Both branches separate further from the asymptote E = h. In the limit Q → 0, the velocity head vanishes everywhere and the E-h curve collapses onto the asymptote — every depth has E = h, with the critical point at the origin. Conversely, in the limit Q → ∞ the curve stays in the same shape but is pushed arbitrarily far right, and the supercritical branch becomes nearly vertical at small h.

Try this in the visualiser above: nudge Q up and down with the geometry fixed, and watch the entire curve breathe accordingly.

References

  1. Bakhmeteff, B. A. (1932). Hydraulics of Open Channels. McGraw-Hill, New York. — first systematic exposition of the specific-energy concept.
  2. Chow, V. T. (1959). Open-Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New York. Chapters 3–4.
  3. Henderson, F. M. (1966). Open Channel Flow. Macmillan, New York. Chapter 2.
  4. Sturm, T. W. (2010). Open Channel Hydraulics (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.
  5. Chanson, H. (2004). The Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.